Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,576
Williams v. V3 Holdings Illinois LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00233
Plaintiff: Elijah D. Williams
Defendant: V3 Holdings Illinois LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Arnold v. Augustine et al
as 4:2024cv00173
Plaintiff: Richard T. Arnold
Defendant: Kenneth P. Augustine, Christopher Neace, Luke James Stobie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00360
Plaintiff: Philip D. Williams
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. USA
as 3:2024cv00104
Petitioner: Anthony D. Williams
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Williams v. USA
as 3:2024cv00105
Petitioner: Anthony D. Williams
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
US v. Anthony Williams
as 24-4043
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: ANTHONY D. WILLIAMS, a/k/a Ray L. Dixon
Helen Louise Golay v. State of California et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00600
Petitioner: Helen Louise Golay
Respondent: State of California and D. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02001
Petitioner: Webster Douglas Williams, III and Webster D. Williams
Respondent: Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
United States v. Damon Williams
as 23-3766
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Damon D. Williams, also known as Damo
United States v. Dante Williams
as 23-3742
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Dante D. Williams

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?