Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,572
BOGGS v. DAVIS et al
as 4:2024cv00172
Plaintiff: HARRY LEE BOGGS, JR
Defendant: DAVIS, BRICE GOOGLE, D WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ricky Dillingham v. K. Mills et al
as 2:2024cv02966
Plaintiff: Ricky Dillingham
Defendant: K. Mills, D. Williams, J. Solorio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00435
Plaintiff: Marty D. Williams
Defendant: Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Encarnacion v. Collado
as 24-911
Defendant: VITARIUS, C.O.; Shawangunk Correctional Facility, Vitarious, OLIVO, C.O.; Shawangunk Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff: BERNABE ENCARNACION
Ricky Dillingham v. K. Mills et al
as 2:2024cv02610
Plaintiff: Ricky Dillingham
Defendant: K. Mills, D. Williams, J. Solorio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 1:2024cv02241
Plaintiff: Andrea D. Williams
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Floyd Scott v. J. Fernald et al
as 2:2024cv01960
Plaintiff: Floyd Dewaine Scott
Defendant: J. Fernald, J. Varela, A. F. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcello Omar Cooper v. Compton Superior Court et al
as 2:2024cv01862
Petitioner: Marcello Omar Cooper
Respondent: Compton Superior Court and D. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00948
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Marcello Cooper v. Compton Superior Court et al
as 2:2024cv01626
Petitioner: Marcello Omar Cooper
Respondent: Compton Superior Court and D. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?