Cases 1 - 10 of 37
GAD v. RIVERA et al
as 2:2022cv04393
Plaintiff:
AHMED FEISAL GAD
Defendant:
SEARGENT RIVERA, DEPUTY BRADLEY, SECURITY OFFICERS WHO SEARCHED MY CELLL 2033 AT D BLOCK ON JULY 16/2022 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Ferguson Unit et al
as 4:2022cv02720
Plaintiff:
John Henry Jones
Defendant:
Ferguson Unit and Cellmate D-Block Ferguson Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Burgess (Curtis)
as 22-735
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Tyshawn Burgess, AKA Ty, AKA Ty Black, Lloyd Gordon, AKA LG, Larry Bayer, AKA L and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Maurice Curtis, AKA Mo
United States of America v. Burgess (Sumpter)
as 22-473
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Tyshawn Burgess, AKA Ty, AKA Ty Black, Lloyd Gordon, AKA LG, Larry Bayer, AKA L and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Tyrell Sumpter, AKA Rell, AKA Ruger
In re: Darius Crenshaw
as 22-103
Petitioner:
In re: DARIUS CRENSHAW, a/k/a D-Block, a/k/a Block, a/k/a Block Head
US v. Williams
as 22-1035
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
DURRELL WILLIAMS, a/k/a D-Block
Morrow v. Bauersfeld
as 21-2928
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Neb Morrow, III
Defendant / Appellee:
Bauersfeld, Commissioner's Hearing Officer (CHO), Auburn Correctional Facility
Defendant:
Harold Graham, Superintendent, Auburn Correctional Facility, Sergeant Van Fleet, Superintendent of D-Block, Auburn Correctional Facility and J. Perkins, Corrections Officer in D-Block, Auburn Correctional Facility
US v. Williams
as 21-1321
Defendant / Appellant:
DURRELL WILLIAMS, a/k/a D-Block
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
USA v. Darren Brown
as 21-1754
Defendant / Appellant:
DARREN BROWN, a/k/a D-Block
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Chirse v. Clemson Business Office et al
as 6:2021cv06022
Defendant:
Clemson Business Office, Piccolo, D-Block Staff "Unknown" and others
Plaintiff:
Devante Chirse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
