Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Newson v. Douglas et al
as 3:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Devoris Newson
Defendant:
Richard D. Douglas, Robert W. Wedemeyer, Camille R. McMullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas v. Whiteville Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2024cv01049
Plaintiff:
Gregory D. Douglas
Defendant:
Whiteville Correctional Facility, Chance Leeds and Latoya Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welch v. Metcalf et al
as 4:2023cv00551
Plaintiff:
Ferrari Welch
Defendant:
D Douglas Metcalf, Pima, County of and Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas v. Woodford County et al
as 1:2023cv01342
Plaintiff:
Gregory D Douglas
Defendant:
Woodford County, Woodford County Board and Charles Feeney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Howard v. Ferrand et al
as 2:2022cv00701
Plaintiff:
D Douglas Howard, Jr
Defendant:
Deputy Paul Ferrand, Deputy Craig McGehee, Sheriff Marlin N. Gusman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DOUGLAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv42793
Plaintiff:
DEVIN D DOUGLAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00464
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DOUGLAS v. LEGACY HOUSING CORPORATION
as 5:2020cv00384
Plaintiff:
DERRICK D DOUGLAS
Defendant:
LEGACY HOUSING CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DOUGLAS v. HODGSON et al
as 5:2020cv00359
Defendant:
CURTIS HODGSON, JOHN NELSON, MARY SANEZ and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK D DOUGLAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
