Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Kingston (PS) v. Jones
as 1:2026cv03234
Petitioner:
Isaiah Elden Kingston
Respondent:
Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
United States v. Kingston
as 26-4094
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ISAIAH ELDEN KINGSTON
Pierce v. City of Spokane et al
as 2:2026cv00301
Plaintiff:
Elden Pierce
Defendant:
City of Spokane, Zachary Johnson, David Kaurin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 fa Removal - Civil Rights - False Arrest
Woolf III v. Parole Supervisor et al
as 3:2026cv01370
Plaintiff:
Elden Lesher Woolf III
Defendant:
Parole Supervisor and Ms. Valdez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owsley v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2026cv00958
Plaintiff:
Elden Owsley
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROSASEN v. KINGDOM OF NORWAY et al
as 1:2026cv01144
Plaintiff:
MARLON ABRAHAM ROSASEN
Defendant:
KINGDOM OF NORWAY, ITS DIRECTORATE FOR IMMIGRATION, ROYAL NORWEGIAN MINISTRY OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Rhoads v. Hart
as 2:2026cv00745
Plaintiff:
Elden Rhoads
Defendant:
Frank E Hart
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Katziela Inc. v. Dbest products, Inc. et al
as 1:2025cv06856
Plaintiff:
Katziela Inc.
Defendant:
Dbest products, Inc. and Richard Elden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Larry Davis v. Wheeler, et al
as 25-3977
Plaintiff:
LARRY DAVIS
Defendant:
DOCTOR NURSE PRACTITIONER WHEELER, SHEELA ELDEN, Nurse Practitioner, DOCTOR BRILL and others
Elden v. Fredrickson, et al.
as 25-6984
Plaintiff:
SPENCER ELDEN
Defendant:
NIRVANA, LLC, UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, INC., THE DAVID GEFFEN COMPANY and others
Movant:
TIMOTHY FREDRICKSON, Proposed Intervenor-Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
