Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Marcus Evans v. Lornetta Smith, et al
as 24-1882
Plaintiff:
Marcus D. Evans
Defendant:
Lornetta Smith, Sergeant, Varner Unit, ADC, Telicia Mothershed and Marquis Taylor, Corporal, Verner Unit, ADC (Originally named as "M Taylor")
Evans v. O'Malley et al
as 0:2023cv03799
Plaintiff:
Wesley D Evans
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kelso v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv03073
Plaintiff:
Larry G Kelso
Defendant:
3M Company, CHCA Pearland L.P. doing business as HCA Houston Healthcare Pearland, HCA Pearland GP, Inc. and others
Evans v. Bevis et al
as 4:2022cv00458
Plaintiff:
Jermain D Evans
Defendant:
David Bevis, Russellville, City of, Chris Hargett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Overland v. Synergies3 TEC Services, LLC
as 4:2021cv01008
Plaintiff:
Talon Overland, Daniel Murphy, Mike Baker and others
Defendant:
Synergies3 TEC Services, LLC, Benton Odom and Eric Atchley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv01528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Whitfield v. Evansfield Distillery, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00276
Plaintiff:
John Whitfield
Defendant:
Dennis D Evans and Evansfield Distillery, LLC
Counter Defendant:
Whitfield Bryson LLP
Counter Claimant:
Evansfield Distillery Business Group and Evansfield Distillery Business Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Evans v. Bevis et al
as 4:2020cv00754
Defendant:
Russellville Arkansas, City of, David Bevis and Jeff Humphrey
Plaintiff:
Jermain D Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Evans v. Smith et al
as 4:2020cv00173
Defendant:
Telicia Mothershed, M Taylor and Lorenetta Smith
Plaintiff:
Marcus D Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Brookside Fitness
as 4:2018cv00074
Defendant:
Brookside Fitness
Plaintiff:
Joshua D. Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
