Cases 1 - 10 of 61
USA v. John Glenn, Jr.
as 23-3181
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN D. GLENN, JR.
Glenn v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00350
Petitioner:
Coy D. Glenn
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In RE: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, And Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2023cv00818
In Re:
In RE: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, And Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff:
Mahogany Lee, Keaira Gamble, Jenny Mitchell and others
Defendant:
Kimberly Smith, L'Oreal USA, Inc, Soft Sheen Carson, LLC and others
Williams et al v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as ILN/1:22-CV-06110
Plaintiff:
Williams, Evelyn L Williams, Tabatha Taggart and others
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc, L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc. and others
Williams et al v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06110
Plaintiff:
Evelyn L Williams, Tabatha Taggart, Tameka M. Meadows and others
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., Softsheen-Carson, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
GLENN v. WARDEN
as 1:2022cv05675
Petitioner:
JOHN D. GLENN, JR.
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GLENN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv02446
Plaintiff:
JOHN D. GLENN, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Glenn v. Wells Fargo Bank, N. A.
as 3:2022cv00269
Plaintiff:
Jason D. Glenn
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N. A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
USA v. Spurlock
as 3:2021cv01176
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Pamela D Spurlock and Pamela D. Glenn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
USA v. John Glenn, Jr.
as 21-2585
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN D. GLENN, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
