Cases 1 - 10 of 16
HANKS v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv02155
Plaintiff:
SHANNON D. HANKS and SHANNON D HANKS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hanks v. City of Shoreline et al
as 2:2021cv00600
Defendant:
Shasta A Willson, Shoreline Police, City of Shoreline and others
Plaintiff:
Gayle D Hanks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanks et al v. City of Seattle et al
as 2:2021cv00601
Defendant:
Ohana, Dennis B Hoffman, 7 Attorneys Involved and others
Plaintiff:
Gayle D Hanks and Cheri MaKay Wright Oropez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanks v. Doe
as 2:2021cv00006
Defendant:
Praetorian Insurance Co. and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Wayne D. Hanks, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HANKE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv13953
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS D HANKE
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HANKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv77221
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. HANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv04836
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hanks v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 6:2015cv03552
Plaintiff:
Kevin D Hanks
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Creel et al v. Ard et al
as 3:2014cv00551
Defendant:
Jason Gerald Ard, Ryan Bernard, Brandon Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Jackson Landreth Creel, Jr., McCoy Edward Creel, III, Paige Creel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Seely et al v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv00237
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, Catherine Cortez-Masto, Greg Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Andre' D. Boston, J. Castro, D. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
