Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Marcus Polk v. Tony Parker, et al
as 22-5506
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARCUS D. POLK
Defendant / Appellee:
TONY PARKER, TDOC Commissioner, in his individual capacity, RUBENARD RISPER, Chief of Security at Trousdale Turner Correctional Complex, in his individual and official capacity, YOLANDA PITTMAN, Associate Warden, in her individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Summers v. Collier et al
as 9:2021cv00121
Plaintiff:
Anthony Leon Summers
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Stephen Bryant, Lanette Linthicum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLLIER v. BURNES et al
as 1:2020cv02701
Defendant:
DANIEL T. FLOYD, BALDEN D. POLK, DANNY OLIPHANT and others
Plaintiff:
DARRON LASHAWN COLLIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Polk v. Armstrong
as 1:2020cv01047
Plaintiff:
Marcus D. Polk
Defendant:
Sarah Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Polk v. Parker et al
as 3:2020cv00069
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Alexa Hawkins, F/N/U Risper and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus D. Polk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Polk v. Parker et al
as 1:2020cv01020
Defendant:
F/N/U Washburn, Tony Parker, Alexa Hawkins and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus D. Polk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Polk v. Wilcher
as 4:2019cv00233
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Polk
Defendant:
Cpl. Munoz and Sheriff Wilcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AGARWAL et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv03125
Defendant:
MCCALLA RAYMER LEIBERT PIERCE, LLC, JACQUELINE L. RUSSELL, ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Plaintiff:
ANIL AGARWAL, MADHU AGARWAL and RISHI RAKSHPAL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Polk v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
as 1:2017cv00297
Plaintiff:
Nicole D. Polk
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
