Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Williams v. Taylor et al
as 1:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
Qian Williams
Defendant:
Dale Taylor and Kenneth Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Taylor et al
as 1:2022cv00769
Plaintiff:
Qian Williams
Defendant:
Dale Taylor, Kenneth Baker, Karl Kadon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Taylor
as 1:2022mc00013
Plaintiff:
Shawn L. Davis
Defendant:
Officer Dale Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. $28,000 in US Currency
as 3:2022cv00839
Plaintiff:
United States
Defendant:
$28,000 and $28,000 in US Currency
Claimant:
Dale Taylor
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Davis v. Taylor et al
as 1:2020cv00189
Defendant:
Hasmakhbhai Chaudhry and Dale Taylor
Plaintiff:
Shawn L Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv62493
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY DALE TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Taylor et al
as 1:2020mc00013
Defendant:
Hasmakhbhai Chaudhry and Dale Taylor
Plaintiff:
Shawn L Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Eli Lilly & Company
as 3:2018cv07462
Plaintiff:
Dale Taylor
Defendant:
Eli Lilly & Co and Eli Lilly & Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shearlock et al v. Volkswagen Group of America Inc et al
as 3:2016cv03008
Plaintiff:
Sheila Shearlock , Krishnamurthy Nadella , Dolores Marchigiano and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America Inc, Volkswagen A.G. and Robert Bosch GmbH
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
SHEARLOCK et al v. VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA INC et al
as FLN/3:16-cv-00211
Plaintiff:
SHEILA M SHEARLOCK , KRISHNAMURTHY NADELLA , DOLORES MARCHIGIANO and others
Defendant:
VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA INC , VOLKSWAGEN AG and ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
