Cases 1 - 10 of 18
May v. Calhoun, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
Herbert May
Defendant:
Calhoun, County of, Kurtis Cunkle, Sterling Ladd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker et al v. Cheatham County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2020cv00244
Defendant:
Shane Hanson, Cheatham County, Tennessee, Michael Breedlove and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Baker and Jariel Kling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER v. JONES et al
as 1:2019cv00210
Defendant:
Lieutenant WAKEFIELD, Sergeant WRIGHT, Sergeant THOMAS and others
Plaintiff:
AVERY DANIELLE BAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER v. JONES et al
as 4:2019cv00193
Defendant:
Lieutenant WAKEFIELD, Sergeant WRIGHT, Sergeant THOMAS and others
Plaintiff:
AVERY DANIELLE BAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
as 7:2019cv00115
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Plaintiff:
AVERY DANIELLE BAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Harris et al v. Brown et al
as 2:2019cv01406
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Cathey, David Chubbuck, Eric Curtis and others
Defendant:
Jerry Brown, Jr., Scott Kernan and Robert W. Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER v. ANDERSON et al
as 7:2019cv00043
Defendant:
CEDRIC MONTGOMERY, LARRY TAYLOR, DAVID ANDERSON and others
Plaintiff:
AVERY DANIELLE BAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARKINS v. KREINHOPP et al
as 1:2017cv02426
Defendant:
DANIEL BAKER, STEVE COURTER, TRAVIS DAY and others
Plaintiff:
CHRIS EDWARD HARKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 2:2016cv02305
Plaintiff:
Monolito B. Cooper
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, Derrick Schofield, Corrections Corporation of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Clark et al
as 1:2015cv00164
Plaintiff:
Monolito B. Cooper
Defendant:
Jerry Clark, David - Patterson, Buddy Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
