Cases 31 - 40 of 90
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05137
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00662
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Whitley v. New Mexico Office of Attorney General et al
as 6:2019cv00026
Defendant:
Monica Danielle Morris, New Mexico Office of Attorney General and Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Child Support Services
Plaintiff:
Lee Michael Whitley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitley v. Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Child Support Services et al
as 6:2019cv00021
Defendant:
Monica Danielle Morris and Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Child Support Services
Plaintiff:
Lee Michael Whitley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitley v. Texas Office of Attorney General et al
as 6:2019cv00022
Defendant:
Monica Danielle Morris, Peter N. Susca and Texas Office of Attorney General
Plaintiff:
Lee Michael Whitley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donaldson et al v. HSBC Holdings PLC et al
as 1:2018cv07442
Plaintiff:
Tamara Stout, Rachel Lambright, Mary Steinman and others
Defendant:
Barclays Bank PLC, Bank Saderat PLC, NATWEST MARKETS N.V. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Johnson v. Kallis
as 1:2018cv01415
Respondent:
Steve Kallis
Petitioner:
Daniel Morris Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv04210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv00934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Johnson v. USA
as 0:2017cv05159
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Daniel Morris Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
