Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv28019
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Barr v. Bisignano
as 5:2026cv00893
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Plaintiff:
Dante Barr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03051
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Carrick et al v. Costello et al
as 2:2026cv03721
Defendant:
Angel Bothof, Almighty Bail Bonds Inc., Dante B. Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
John Henry Briseno, Jewell Estell Briseno and Cam'Ron Marcus Carrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Contrares et al
as 2:2026cv00088
Defendant:
Axel Rodriguez and Dante Contrares
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lee Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
FREDRICK v. WARDEN, FDC PHILA et al
as 2:2026cv08332
Respondent:
U.S.M.S DELAWARE and WARDEN, FDC PHILA
Petitioner:
DANTE FREDRICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Picozzi v. Nash, et al.
as 26-7230
Defendant:
RENAN SAINTPREUX, MICHAEL VAL, RODOLFO VALLE and others
Plaintiff:
MARK PICOZZI
Evans v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2026cv00475
Petitioner:
Anthony Dante Evans
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv01592
Plaintiff:
Dante Woods
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
WOODALL v. PA. BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 2:2026cv02249
Plaintiff:
ERNEST WOODALL
Defendant:
PA. BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, WESTMORELAND COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE, P.D. DANTE G. BERTANI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
