Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Fleming v. Woodley et al
as 3:2021cv00137
Defendant:
Juanita Daniels, Daryl Williams and Tameca Woodley
Plaintiff:
Ras Solomon Fleming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hallinan et al v. Scarantino et al
as 5:2020ct03333
Defendant:
Jeffrey Allen, Warden Thomas Scarantino, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
George Riddick, Josean Kinard, Terrance Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00563
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
WASALAAM v. KERSEY et al
as 1:2018cv00314
Plaintiff:
SULYAMAN AL ISLAM WASALAAM
Defendant:
RALPH KERSEY, DEPARTMENT SCOTLAND COUNTY, DARYL WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sulyaman Wasalaam v. Christ Young
as 16-7411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SULYAMAN ALISLAM WASALAAM
Defendant - Appellee:
DETECTIVE CHRIST YOUNG, CHIEF DARYL WILLIAMS, SCOTLAND COUNTY AND CITY OF LAURINBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT DETENTION CENTER and others
WASALAAM v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2016cv01068
Plaintiff:
SULYAMAN AL ISLAM WASALAAM
Defendant:
CHRIST YOUNG, DARYL WILLIAMS, SCOTLAND COUNTY AND CITY OF LAURINBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT DETENTION CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sulyaman Wasalaam v. Christ Young
as 15-7512
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SULYAMAN WASALAAM
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRIST YOUNG, DARYL WILLIAMS, SHERIFF RALPH KERSEY and others
WASALAAM v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2015cv00734
Plaintiff:
SULYAMAN WASALAAM
Defendant:
CHRIST YOUNG, RALPH KERSEY and DARYL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WASALAAM v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2015cv00642
Plaintiff:
SULYAMAN WASALAAM
Defendant:
CHRIST YOUNG, DARYL WILLIAMS, RALPH KERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv08825
Plaintiff:
Joannah Williams and Daryl Williams
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
