Cases 1 - 10 of 26
David A Day v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2024cv00649
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
David A Day
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv42776
Plaintiff:
DAVID W DAY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv03507
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID ALAN DAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
David Day, Jr. v. USA
as 18-2398
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID L. DAY, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mo'i Kapu v. Attorney General of the State, et al
as 17-17310
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MO'I KAPU, AKA John Eleu Freeman Santos, AKA Jon Santos
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF HAWAII, Corporate STATE OF HAWAI'I ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE, Doug Chin, STATE OF HAWAII, Corporate State of Hawai'i, Sheriff Division, Nolan Espinda, BUREAU OF CONVEYANCES, State of Hawaii and others
Fern Exposition Services, LLC v. Management 2000, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00056
Plaintiff:
Fern Exposition Services, LLC
Defendant:
Management 2000, Inc. , Managepoint, LLC and David E. Day
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Day v. Janssen Research & Development LLC, et al
as 2:2016cv15490
Plaintiff:
David J. Day
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DeBoard v. Dayton Drones LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00068
Plaintiff:
Mathew J DeBoard
Defendant:
Dayton Drones LLC and David Jason Day
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
DAY v. THE S/Y CAPIBARA
as 9:2015cv80242
Plaintiff:
DAVID WILLIAM DAY
Defendant:
THE S/Y CAPIBARA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
