Cases 1 - 10 of 21
David Wicks v. Shane Halstead, et al
as 17-15579
Defendant / Appellee:
SHANE HALSTEAD, Wal-Mart Employee, DUVAL COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE, WALMART STORES - WALMART and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID BRYANT WICKS
Wicks v. Powell et al
as 3:2017cv00718
Plaintiff:
David Bryant Wicks
Defendant:
Lena Powell, Mr. Shaw, Ms. Latoya and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wicks v. Haley et al
as 4:2016cv03652
Plaintiff:
David Bryant Wicks
Defendant:
Nikki R. Haley, Kenny Boone, E L Clements, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WICKS v. WALMART STORE MANAGER/SUPERVISOR et al
as 1:2016cv00189
Plaintiff:
DAVID BRYANT WICKS
Defendant:
WALMART STORE MANAGER/SUPERVISOR, LAMAR SKELTON, D. BRAD RIELY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WICKS v. LOCKLEAR et al
as 1:2016cv00162
Plaintiff:
DAVID BRYANT WICKS
Defendant:
LOCKLEAR, BRIMMER, PHILLIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wicks v. Tamargo et al
as 3:2015cv01260
Plaintiff:
David Bryant Wicks
Defendant:
J. A. Tamargo, Darryl Daniels, Willie Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wicks v. Halstead et al
as 3:2015cv01072
Plaintiff:
David Bryant Wicks
Defendant:
Shane Halstead, Wal-Mart Department Store, Ashley I. Riggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WICKS v. WAL-MART DEPT. STORE MANAGER et al
as 1:2015cv00269
Plaintiff:
DAVID BRYANT WICKS
Defendant:
WAL-MART DEPT. STORE MANAGER, LAMAR SKELTON, CONCORD POLICE DEPT. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Wicks v. Walmart Department Store
as 14-7152
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID BRYANT WICKS
Defendant - Appellee:
WALMART DEPARTMENT STORES, JUSTIN SHERMAN, MIKE WHITE and others
Wicks v. Walmart Dept. Stores et al
as 1:2014cv02293
Plaintiff:
David Bryant Wicks
Defendant:
Walmart Dept. Stores, Justin Sherman, Mike White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
