Cases 1 - 10 of 377
G v. Campbell et al
as 0:2024cv04622
Defendant:
City of Minneapolis and David Edward Campbell
Plaintiff:
L M G
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nyugen v. Nalley et al
as 4:2024cv02110
Defendant:
Christian Stone, John R. Rivello, Gabrielle Nalley and others
Plaintiff:
Phu Van Nyugen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Farnham v. Silverman, et al
as 6:2024cv01725
Defendant:
Psychologist Jeffrey Matthew, City Manager Shawn Michael Fletcher, Sheriff Andrew Weston and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Russell Farnham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ziegler, et al. v. Washington State Correctional Industries, et al.
as 24-5389
Defendant:
BOBBI JO NEUMEIER, SCOTT LIGHT, P.A.C., THOMAS L'HEUREUX, MHO and others
Plaintiff:
ALVIN L. HEGGE and JEFFREY SCOTT ZIEGLER
MAHONEY v. LOWER MERION SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2024cv04576
Plaintiff:
PHILIP MAHONEY
Defendant:
HARRITON HIGH SCHOOL, David Edward Molod, Jennifer Molod and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Farmer v. Lumpkin
as 2:2024cv00178
Petitioner:
Tyler David Edward Farmer
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Darin Earl et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv04324
Plaintiff:
Brandon Eisenacher, David Earnest, Cheryl Ellis and others
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Davis v. Cargor
as 2:2024cv12042
Petitioner:
David Edward Davis
Respondent:
Kim Cargor
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
