Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Graham v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2022cv00467
Plaintiff:
Cody Graham
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Johnny Wilson, CO II David Ewing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Nichols v. Pope County Detention Center et al
as 4:2021cv01231
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Nichols
Defendant:
Pope County Detention Center, Flagg, Dunham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tomlinson v. Trigg County, Kentucky et al
as 5:2021cv00034
Defendant:
Trigg County, Kentucky doing business as Trigg County Sheriff's Office and Aaron Acree
Plaintiff:
David Ewing Tomlinson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
EWING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv07197
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID EWING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re Attorney Admission for Charles David Ewing
as 5:2020aa00125
In Re:
Charles David Ewing and Attorney Admission Application
EWING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv20415
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID EWING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Greene v. David Ballard
as 20-6454
Defendant / Appellee:
SARAH COOPER, Psy. Dr./MHU Staff, SHANNON COLEMAN, MHU Staff, KEN BOWLIN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL JERMAINE GREENE
Worley v. Ewing et al
as 2:2019cv00543
Defendant:
Jonathan Frame, Charles Johnston, Betsy Jividen and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Worley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mabry v. Jividen et al
as 2:2019cv00424
Defendant:
Donald Slack, Captain Brian Pinick, Timothy Forren and others
Plaintiff:
David L. Mabry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shawn Riley v. David Ewing
as 19-1279
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID EWING, Chaplain
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN RILEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
