Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Frank v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv03768
Plaintiff:
Joshua David Frank
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Dilworth Police department, Schlee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frank v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv03767
Plaintiff:
Joshua David Frank
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Moorhead Police department, Zach Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Campeau et al v. Sandercock et al
as 3:2021cv00280
Defendant:
Kathleen Bausman and Edward Sandercock
Plaintiff:
Christin Campeau and David Frank Campeau, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PS) Lull v. County of Placer et al
as 2:2019cv02444
Defendant:
David Frank, Michael Profant, Kirk Uhler and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Lull
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart bey v. Parkview Hospital Inc et al
as 1:2019cv00407
Defendant:
David Stacks, David Frank, Bloom berg bna and others
Plaintiff:
Tyquan Stewart bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pacheco v. Coolack et al
as 2:2018cv00872
Defendant:
Unified Police Department of Greater Salt Lake and Shannon Coolack
Plaintiff:
David Frank Pacheco, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stewart bey v. Christopher C Myers & Associates et al
as 1:2018cv00186
Plaintiff:
Tyquan Stewart bey
Defendant:
Christopher C Myers & Associates, David Frank, Mark Baeverstad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roebke v. Kreisman et al
as 0:2018cv01273
Plaintiff:
Alan Harold Roebke
Defendant:
Barbara Kreisman, David Frank, John Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Durham v. Gilleberto et al
as 1:2017cv10803
Plaintiff:
Charles J. Durham
Defendant:
Michael P. Gilleberto , Michael P. Murphy , Thomas Romeo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-16231
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
