Cases 71 - 80 of 145
In re USA Technologies, Inc. Securities Litigation
as 2:2018cv13759
Plaintiff:
STEPHANE GOUET
Defendant:
STEPHEN P. HERBERT, USA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and PRIYANKA SINGH
Petitioner:
DELAWARE COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, HAROLD WEBER, UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
ANTHONY E PHILLIPS and DAVID GRAY
In Re:
USA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION
Lead Plaintiff:
PINKESH NAHAR
David Gray v. Phil Bryant, et al
as 18-60617
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID GRAY
Defendant - Appellee:
PHIL BRYANT, Governor, State of Mississippi, JIM HOOD, Attorney General, State of Mississippi, BRIAN RICHARDSON, Mississippi Bureau of Investigations and others
Williams v. Gray
as 1:2018cv01964
Respondent:
Warden David Gray
Petitioner:
Kinyatae Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gerald v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
as 5:2018cv01907
Petitioner:
Jeremy X Gerald
Respondent:
Warden David Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Canales v. Gray
as 5:2018cv01857
Petitioner:
Cesar Canales
Respondent:
Warden David Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Quinones v. Gray
as 1:2018cv01492
Respondent:
Warden David Gray
Petitioner:
Andrew Quinones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Parker et al v. Clark et al
as 0:2018cv01809
Defendant:
Cole Peterson, Blayne Lehner, City of Minneapolis, the and others
Plaintiff:
Regina Coleman, Ksean Ewing, Chiquita Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Person v. Gray
as 5:2018cv01374
Petitioner:
Larry D. Person
Respondent:
David Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Turner v. Gray
as 5:2018cv01285
Petitioner:
Marcus Turner
Respondent:
David Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gray v. Bryant et al
as 1:2018cv00152
Plaintiff:
David Gray
Defendant:
Phil Bryant, Jim Hood, Brian Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
