Cases 71 - 80 of 86
Shields v. Chicago Police Dept. et al
as 1:2009cv04193
Plaintiff:
David Harrison Shields
Defendant:
Chicago Police Dept., Edward Garcia, Louis Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Travis et al
as 1:2009cv02288
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Brian Travis, Nicholas Peter Vulpis, JR., David Harrison Baker and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Harrison v. United States Marshall Service et al
as 1:2008cv02991
Petitioner:
David Harrison
Respondent:
United States Marshall Service and Robert A. Deyton Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
David Harrison Greer v. Aqua-Chem, Inc., et al.
as NCW/1:08-CV-00308
Plaintiff:
David Harrison Greer
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc
Broxson v. Turner et al(MAG+)
as 2:2008cv00582
Plaintiff:
Elephenia Thompkins Broxson
Defendant:
Chris Turner and David Harrison
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Greer v. Aqua-Chem, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00308
Plaintiff:
David Harrison Greer
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc., Borg-Warner Morse TEC, Inc., CertainTeed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
David Harrison v. Zurn Industries, Inc.
as PAE/2:08-CV-64065
Plaintiff:
David Harrison
Defendant:
Zurn Industries, Inc.
Harrison v. USA
as 1:2008cv00034
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jonathan David Harrison
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
HARRISON v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv64065
Plaintiff:
DAVID HARRISON and DAVID HARRISON
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Margaret Eichenlaub et al v. Leroy Baca et al
as 2:2007cv08098
Plaintiff:
Margaret Eichenlaub, Margaret Eichenlaub, David Eichenlaub and others
Defendant:
Leroy Baca, Gilbert Ramirez, Michael Barlow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
