Cases 1 - 10 of 23
FRAY v. BUTTIGIEG et al
as 1:2023cv03708
Plaintiff:
EDDIE L. FRAY
Defendant:
PETE BUTTIGIEG, RYAN POSTEN, RODNEY RUDD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Khan v. St. Mary Hospital et al
as 1:2020cv03819
Defendant:
St. Mary Hospital, Thomas Mulvar, Savedra Olga and others
Plaintiff:
Nazir Khan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TYLER v. LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2020cv02919
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, CHERYL STEBERGER, LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON BOARD and others
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HINES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv46089
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID HINES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HINES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv11993
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID HINES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hines et al v. Maalt Specialized Bulk, LLC
as 6:2017cv00044
Defendant:
Maalt Specialized Bulk, LLC
Plaintiff:
David Hines , Albert Samarripa , Josh Swain and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
USA v. David Hine
as 17-30270
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID HINES
Trosclair v. Ackal et al
as 6:2017cv00470
Plaintiff:
Ray Trosclair
Defendant:
Louis Ackal, Byron Benjamin Lassalle, David Hines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HINES v. MUTUAL OF OMAHA INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2015cv00245
Plaintiff:
DAVID HINES
Defendant:
MUTUAL OF OMAHA INSURANCE COMPANY and JOHN HUNTER
Counter_claimant:
MUTUAL OF OMAHA INSURANCE COMPANY
Counter_defendant:
DAVID HINES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barksdale v. Wall et al
as 2:2015cv00040
Plaintiff:
Kajuan L Barksdale
Defendant:
Edward F Wall , Charles Facktor, David Hines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
