Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Gavin Howard v. State of Alabama, et al
as 22-14170
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GAVIN HOWARD
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ALABAMA, DAVID PATE and JORDAN POWELL
Angela Nails v. State of Alabama, et al
as 22-12718
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGELA DENISE NAILS
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CARRIER, ANDREW HAMLIN and others
Howard v. Powell
as 7:2022cv00727
Plaintiff:
Gavin Howard
Defendant:
Jordan Powell, Jeremy Herd, Keith Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nails v. Alabama, State of et al
as 7:2022cv00396
Plaintiff:
Angela Denise Nails
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, State Employees Insurance Carrier, Andrew Hamlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PATE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv07391
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID PATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PATE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv40828
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA DAVID PATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pate v. Young
as 5:2019cv00600
Petitioner:
David Pate
Respondent:
David L. Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
COFFEY et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03133
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK ROBINSON, VALONZA DIXON, TRAVIS MORROW and others
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Coffey et al v. 3M Company et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 0:2019cv02101
Plaintiff:
Frederick Robinson, Valonza Dixon, Travis Morrow and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NewStar Sourcing and Service, LLC v. Patee et al
as 8:2019cv00226
Defendant:
Consumers Supply Distributing, LLC, David Patee and Daniel Patee
Plaintiff:
NewStar Sourcing and Service, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
