Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
v. PETERSEN et al
as 3:2023cv22511
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, DAVID PETERSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Cornel Jackson v. County of Madera, et al
as 22-16920
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CORNEL JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF MADERA, a Municipality of the State of California, BRETT FRAZIER, DAVID ROGERS and others
USA v. David Petersen
as 22-12483
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID PETERSEN
Petersen v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
as 8:2022cv00141
Plaintiff:
David Petersen
Defendant:
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jackson v. County of Madera, et al.
as 1:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Cornel Jackson
Defendant:
County of Madera, Brett Frazier, David Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. David Petersen
as 21-11500
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID PETERSEN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
PETERSEN v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 2:2021cv01346
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Plaintiff:
DAVID PETERSEN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Cohen v. Chase Card Funding, LLC
as 20-3631
Defendant / Appellee:
Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee of Chase Insurance Trust, Chase Insurance Trust and Chase Card Funding, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Petersen
Plaintiff:
Christy Ogrodoski, William Cohen, Linda Johnson and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
