Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Johnson v. Marks, et al.
as 26-5727
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY H. JOHNSON
Defendant:
DANA MARKS, E. PARKS, J. MAINWARING and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02394
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01352
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Pretrial Detainee)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02851
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hall v. LaSalle Corrections West, LLC, et al.
as 26-1732
Plaintiff:
MARCO WAYNE HALL
Defendant:
LASALLE CORRECTIONS WEST, LLC, DOES, named as John Doe #1 Correctional Officer; John Doe #2 Sergeant; John Doe #3 Lieutenant; John Doe #4 Captain at San Luis Regional Detention Center; John Doe #5 and #6 Assistant Warden at San Luis Regional Detention, WILLIAM MCCONNELL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00556
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00855
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-701
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-570
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv04821
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
