Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Muhammad v. Wiles
as 23-50786
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bilal Muhammad
Defendant / Appellee:
Richard Wiles, El Paso County Sheriff, Marco Vargas, Kevin Lanahan and others
STOUT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv04649
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA DAVID STOUT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bilal Muhammad v. Richard Wiles, et al
as 20-50279
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID STOUT, RICARDO SAMANIEGO, EL PASO COUNTY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BILAL MUHAMMAD
Muhammad v. Wiles et al
as 3:2019cv00367
Defendant:
John Doe 1-125, Joanne Bernal, Aramark Services Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Bilal Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LabMD, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
as 16-16270
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS SMALL BUSINESS LEGAL CENTER, PRIVACY AND SECURITY LAW PROFESSORS, BRADLEY SECREST and others
Petitioner:
LABMD, INC.
Respondent:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Stout v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
as 1:2012cv02634
Plaintiff:
David Stout
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
RREF BB Acquisitions, LLC v. Oakbrooke Properties, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00563
Plaintiff:
RREF BB Acquisitions, LLC
Defendant:
Oakbrooke Properties, LLC, Builders-Designers of Kentucky, Inc., KLS Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kory Clay v. Michael Bowersox, et al
as 12-1423
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kory S. Clay
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael Bowersox, Preston Cooper, Tamara Stell and others
Stout v. The United States of America
as 5:2011cv05119
Plaintiff:
David Stout
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clay v. Bowersox et al
as 6:2010cv03503
Plaintiff:
Kory S Clay
Defendant:
Michael Bowersox, Preston Cooper, Tamara Stell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
