Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 118
Royal Fund LP et al v. Deloitte & Touche LLP et al
as 1:2018cv11198
Plaintiff: Royal Fund LP and Stephenson Ventures
Defendant: Sidley Austin LLP, Deloitte & Touch LLP and Deloitte & Touche LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bickel v. Deloitte & Touche, LLP
as 1:2018cv02014
Plaintiff: Melissa Bickel
Defendant: Deloitte & Touche, LLP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
In Re FANNIE MAE SECURITIES LITIGATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2004cv01639
Defendant: DANIEL H. MUDD, J.TIMOTHY HOWARD, FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION and others
Interested Party: MCSLARROW CONSULTING LLC, MILLER, HAMILTON, SNIDER & ODOM, OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT and others
Petitioner: COMINVEST ASSET MANAGEMENT GMBH, SCHERTLER & ONORATO, STATMAN. HARRIS & EYRICH, LLC and others
Plaintiff: INSTITUTIONAL FIDUCIARY TRUST, FRANKLIN FLEX CAP GROWTH CORPORATE CLASS, FRANKLIN CUSTODIAN FUNDS, INC. and others
In Re: FANNIE MAE SECURITIES LITIGATION
Cross Claimant: KPMG LLP
Intervenor Defendant: FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Koesterer vs. Washington Mutual, Inc We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv00387
Plaintiff: Dennis Koesterer, Joel Abrams, Brian Roffe and others
Defendant: Washington Mutual Inc, Kerry K Killinger, David C Schneider and others
Interested Party: Multidistrict Litigation, JEFFREY N. LUTHI, Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund of the City of Chicago, Kim D Stephens and others
Not Classified By Court: Liaison Counsel
Petitioner: Burton Rosenfield, New York City Police and Fire Pension Funds, Massachusetts Pension Reserves Investment Management Board and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
In re: Fannie Mae 2008 Securities Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv07831
Plaintiff: Comprehensive Investment Services, Inc., David L. Frankfurt, John A. Genovese and others
Lead Plaintiff: Boston Retirement Board, Massachusetts Pension Reserves Investment Management Board ("PRIM") and Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System ("TCRS")
Consolidated Plaintiff: Susan Kraus, Linda P. Schweitzer, Stephen H. Schweitzer and others
Defendant: Stephen B. Ashley, Banc of America Securities LLC, Robert T Blakely and others
Consolidated Defendant: Dennis R. Beresford, Deutsche Banc Securities Inc., Louis J. Freeh and others
Intervenor Defendant: Federal Housing Finance Agency
Petitioner: International Fund Management S.A., Luxembourg, Richard H. Moore, Martin Mahler and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04731
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Anthony Edwards, et al v. Deloitte & Touche LLP
as 17-12852
Plaintiff - Appellant: ANTHONY R. EDWARDS, Master Sgt. USAF, retired, GATOR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, PERINI CAPITAL, LLC and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY
Defendant - Appellee: DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
: SERVICE
Edwards et al v. Deloitte & Touche LLP
as 1:2016cv21221
Defendant: Deloitte & Touche LLP
Plaintiff: Anthony R Edwards , Gator Capital Management, LLC , Perini Capital LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Ciuffitelli et al v. Deloitte & Touche LLP et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00580
Plaintiff: Lawrence P. Ciuffitelli, Angela Julien, Greg Julien and others
Defendant: Deloitte & Touche LLP, EisnerAmper LLP, Sidley Austin LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv02593
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?