Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Abila et al v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 3:2021cv01766
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Abila, Nicholas Alexander, Jessica Alvillar-Flores and others
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 ef Electronic Funds Transfer Act
Boyle v. Wilson et al
as 4:2021cv00232
Plaintiff:
Dennis Boyle
Defendant:
S. Williams, Eric Wilson and B.P. Waller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIVES v. WILSON et al
as 1:2019cv04567
Defendant:
MARK LUTHER, JOHN VAHLE, MARION COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK D RIVES, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rives v. Wilson et al
as 3:2019cv01025
Not Yet Classified:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Defendant:
Mark Luther, John Vahle, Marion County Sheriff Department and others
Plaintiff:
Frank D Rives, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dennis Boyle v. Wilson
as 19-10626
Petitioner / Appellant:
DENNIS BOYLE
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN WILSON
Boyle v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2012cv00954
Plaintiff:
Dennis Boyle
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Janetta Sconiers v. California Department of Socia, et al
as 12-15405
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANETTA L. SCONIERS
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, DENNIS BOYLE, FRESNO COUNTY WELFARE DEPARTMENT and others
Boyle et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN REMANDED
as 4:2011cv04006
Plaintiff:
Ana Margarita Boyle and Dennis Boyle
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Barrett Daffin Frappier Turner & Engel, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
James Murphy v. Daryl Bloom, et al
as 11-2662
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES E. MURPHY
Defendant - Appellee:
DARYL F. BLOOM, WENDY C. YINGER, DENNIS BOYLE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
