Cases 11 - 20 of 695
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Angel Rios-Rosa v. Department of Mental Health, et al
as 24-1363
Plaintiff:
Angel David Rios-Rosa
Defendant:
Department of Mental Health, Missouri and Department of Corrections of Missouri
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Crispin v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2023cv01636
Plaintiff:
Jossean Crispin
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, D.M.H.A.S. Police, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooley v. Alabama Department of Mental Health
as 1:2023cv00475
Petitioner:
Jesse Jr. Cooley
Respondent:
Alabama Department of Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3994
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Arco v. Doe, et al.
as 23-4063
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNNY ARCO
Defendant / Appellee:
DOE, ACTORS, LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH and others
Tat v. State of California, et al.
as 23-3663
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROOZBEH TAT
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Attorney General (Xavier Becerra) official capacity, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Attorney General (Xavier Becerra) Official capacity, DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH, Attorney General (Xavier Becerra) official capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2190
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
