Cases 1 - 10 of 259
Quezergue v. Gunn et al
as 3:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
Kenzo Quezergue
Defendant:
Bret T. Gunn, Judge Cheryl Blackburn, Victor S. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Acklin et al v. Express Courier International, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00162
Plaintiff:
Robert Vogt, Mario Jackson, Jerry Wilson and others
Defendant:
EMP LSO Holding Corporation and Express Courier International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Primm v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 3:2019cv00690
Defendant:
Rebecca Hunter, Tennessee Department of Human Resources, Debbie Inglis and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Primm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
HOGAN v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2019cv00135
Plaintiff:
RICKY LAMAR HOGAN
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, EDMUND J BAZAR, JR, HUGH SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crippen v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 3:2017cv01181
Plaintiff:
Eddie Crippen
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, Derrick Schofield, David Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Albert Thomas v. Jim Wetherington, et al
as 17-10064
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERT THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
JIM WETHERINGTON, JOHN DOE, I, GDC HEALTH SERVICES, Clinical Team and others
Pierce v. Schofield et al
as 3:2016cv00673
Plaintiff:
James T Pierce
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Kevin Hampton and Todd Wiggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Angus v. TDOC et al
as 1:2016cv00377
Plaintiff:
Joe H Angus
Defendant:
TDOC, Derrick Schofield, Jason Woodall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Doyle et al
as 2:2016cv02577
Plaintiff:
Michael B. Bailey
Defendant:
Ashley Doyle, Jacqueline McDougle, Jeff Gatlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conner v. Schofield et al
as 3:2016cv01755
Plaintiff:
Robert Conner
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield and James Gray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
