Cases 21 - 30 of 54
US v. Veronica Dew
as 15-2063
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
VERONICA W. DEW
Defendant:
JAMES CHAPPELL DEW, a/k/a J. Chappell Dew, Jr., a/k/a James Chappell Dew, Jr., a/k/a James C. Dew, Jr. and SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
Cooke et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv09475
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
James Dew and Cindy L. Cooke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shari Beneda et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02504
Plaintiff:
Shari Beneda , John Beneda , Doris Cater and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
JONES v. NCDPS et al
as 1:2015cv00234
Plaintiff:
JOHN LEWIS JONES
Defendant:
NCDPS, FRANK L. PERRY, LYNN C. SUMMERS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEW Plumbing Incorporated et al v. Domestic Mortgage Inc et al
as 2:2015mc00050
Plaintiff:
DEW Plumbing Incorporated and Derek Ware
Defendant:
Domestic Mortgage Inc, Fishman & Company PC and R Peter Fishman
Dew v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv30482
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Dew
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mandeville et al v. Nathanson et al
as 5:2014cv25013
Plaintiff:
Meredith Mandeville and Joel Dew
Defendant:
Steven Harry Nathanson and Southeastern Emergency Physicians, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. James C. Dew
as 14-4561
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES CHAPPELL DEW
United States of America v. Dew et al
as 4:2014cv00166
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
James C Dew, Jr, Veronica W Dew and South Carolina Department of Revenue
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Hale v. Viper Trucking Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv03887
Plaintiff:
Deenie Hale
Defendant:
Viper Trucking Inc. and Dylan Dew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
