Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Brice v. Dismas Charities Properties, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00006
Defendant:
Dismas Charities, Inc., Dismas Charities Properties, Inc. and Dismas Employees A & B
Plaintiff:
Allen Brice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00249
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gratton v. Dismas Charities, Inc. (Nashville) et al
as 3:2020cv00509
Petitioner:
Paul Gratton
Respondent:
Tracy Admundson, Dismas Charities, Inc. (Nashville) and Hector Joyner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hatton v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00336
Defendant:
Dismas Charities, Inc., James Bernardi and Kentucky Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Benjamin L. Hatton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Trevari v. Dismas Charities Inc.
as 1:2018cv04123
Defendant:
Dismas Charities Inc., Director Stephen Ricks, Assistant Director Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Michael Trevari
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennison v. Gillespie et al
as 1:2017cv00165
Plaintiff:
Paul Oliver Dennison
Defendant:
Emily Gillespie, Pierre Leconte and Dismas Charities, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baisi v. Gillespie et al
as 1:2017cv00166
Plaintiff:
Gregory Alan Baisi
Defendant:
Emily Gillespie, Pierre LeConte and Dismas Charities, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Baxter v. Dismas Charities, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00407
Plaintiff:
Michael Baxter
Defendant:
Dismas Charities, Inc. and Robert Lanning
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Atwood v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv00074
Plaintiff:
David Garland Atwood, II
Defendant:
United States of America, Bureau of Prisons, David Potts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv00290
Plaintiff:
Paul Mays
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, Webb Strange, Cordant Health Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
