Cases 11 - 20 of 140
Haneef Jackson-Bey v. Three Unknown Federal Agents, et al
as 23-1733
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HANEEF JACKSON-BEY
Defendant / Appellee:
THREE UNKNOW FEDERAL AGENTS, Agents of the DOJ, FBI, and USMS - In their individual capacities, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and THREE UNKNOWN FEDERAL AGENTS, Agents of the DOJ, FBI, and USMS - In their individual capacities
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv60522
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv80429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Shehadeh v. US Dept of Justice
as 3:2023cv03032
Plaintiff:
Jamal Shehadeh
Defendant:
DOJ and United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodgers v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 0:2023cv00181
Petitioner:
David Rodgers
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons and DOJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. USA/DOJ
as 2:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Kevin Wayne Davis
Defendant:
USA/DOJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Davis v. BOP et al
as 3:2022cv02395
Plaintiff:
Kevin Wayne Davis
Defendant:
BOP, DOJ and Seagoville FCI Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv23313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Kopp v. Ziolkowski et al
as 5:2022cv00391
Defendant:
J. Ziolkowski, Deacon Jay, Chaplain Weaver and others
Plaintiff:
James Charles Kopp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JACOBS v. BOP et al
as 1:2022cv00726
Petitioner:
CORY LEE JACOBS
Respondent:
BOP and DOJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
