Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Scott v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 6:2016cv00236
Petitioner:
Donald Ray Scott, Jr.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Tx
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
In re: Donald Scott
as 16-2137
Petitioner:
In re: DONALD A. SCOTT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Avemco Insurance Company v. Scott et al
as 1:2016cv00833
Plaintiff:
Avemco Insurance Company
Defendant:
Donald E. Scott and J. Landis Martin
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 8705 - Declaratory Judgment - Insurance
Scott v. Dimas et al
as 4:2015cv04221
Plaintiff:
Donald D Scott
Defendant:
James T Dimas, Herbert Caskey, Shan Jumper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Donald Scott
as 15-2226
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DONALD A. SCOTT
Scott et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc et al
as 6:2014cv03048
Plaintiff:
Donald K Scott
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCOTT v. STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO.
as 4:2014cv00075
Plaintiff:
DONALD R. SCOTT
Defendant:
STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Scott v. USA
as 1:2014cv00216
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Donald A. Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Azadpour v. City of Euless et al
as 4:2013cv00490
Plaintiff:
Mostafa Aram Azadpour
Defendant:
City of Euless , Mary Lib Saleh , Tim Stinneford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Naquin et al v. BP Exploration & Production Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv01634
Plaintiff:
Bryant A. Naquin , Velma C. Naquin , Brandon Anthony Newton and others
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company, BP p.l.c. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701 - Oil Pollution Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
