Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Hines et al v. Damhas et al
as 3:2024cv00816
Plaintiff:
Marquese Hines, Shameka Hines and Telly Hines
Defendant:
Damhas, Earl Given, 915 Lafayette Blv Room 400 06604 and others
Jerome Garcia v. South Carolina DSS Child Support Agency
as 24-1366
Plaintiff:
JEROME GARCIA
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA DSS CHILD SUPPORT AGENCY
Manley v. HRA/DSS et al
as 1:2024cv01635
Plaintiff:
Eric Manley
Defendant:
HRA/DSS and Kadeja Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garcia v. Swick et al
as 3:2024cv00682
Defendant:
South Carolina DSS, James Swick, SCDSS and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Worrick v. Hill et al
as 2:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
Jedidiah Worrick
Defendant:
Rebecca Hill, Charles Turkle, Colleton County DSS Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramsey v. Taylor et al
as 3:2023cv05537
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Justin Ramsey
Defendant:
Angela R. Taylor, Sumter County DSS, Sumter County Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
RHOADS et al v. GUILFORD COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2023cv00854
Plaintiff:
GINGER RHOADS, SCOTT RHOADS, WAYLON ETHRIDGE and others
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA, GUILFORD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, SHARON BARLOW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv12429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Etheredge v. The State of North Carolina et al
as 2:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Christine Amber Etheredge
Defendant:
The State of North Carolina, Lori Langley, Andrea Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
