Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Tustin Ranch Partners v. Thompson et al
as 3:2023cv00493
Plaintiff:
Tustin Ranch Partners, Inc. doing business as Greenfield Mobile Estates
Defendant:
Dwayne Thompson and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 rl Diversity-Rent Lease & Ejectment
United States of America v. Carrasquillo (Thompson)
as 23-6007
Defendant:
JOSE CARRASQUILLO and Pete
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DWAYNE THOMPSON
Thompson v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2017cv01748
Petitioner:
Michael Dwayne Thompson
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
THOMPSON v. HENS-GRECO et al
as 2:2016cv01100
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE THOMPSON
Defendant:
KATHRYN M. HENS-GRECO, KIMBERLY BERKELEY CLARK, KRISTA ABRAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2015cv00307
Petitioner:
William Dwayne Thompson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Kevin Thompson
as 15-5152
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KEVIN DWAYNE THOMPSON, aka "Clump"
Thompson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2015cv00063
Petitioner:
William Dwayne Thompson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allen Thompson v. USDC-AZT
as 14-72129
:
In re: ALLEN DWAYNE THOMPSON
Petitioner:
ALLEN DWAYNE THOMPSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, TUCSON
Real Party In Interest:
BECKY CLAY
Clayton v. Forrester et al
as 3:2013cv01211
Plaintiff:
Mark Clayton
Defendant:
Chip Forrester, Brandon Puttbrese, Sean Braisted and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. Dwayne Thompson
as 13-1874
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DWAYNE THOMPSON, AKA White Chocolate
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
