Cases 1 - 10 of 16
RUSSELL v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv15707
Plaintiff:
DANA RUSSELL
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Li v. Vivint Solar, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00171
Defendant:
Vivint Solar, Dana Russell and David Bywater
Plaintiff:
Zhaoer Li
Crumrine v. Vivint Solar, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00919
Petitioner:
Brian Chow, Steven Mullen, Zhaoer Li and others
Defendant:
David Bywater, Dana Russell and Vivint Solar
Plaintiff:
Jason Crumrine
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Li v. Vivint Solar, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv06165
Plaintiff:
Zhaoer Li
Defendant:
Vivint Solar, Inc., Dana Russell and David Bywater
Li v. Vivint Solar, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv06165
Plaintiff:
Zhaoer Li
Defendant:
Vivint Solar, Inc., Dana Russell and David Bywater
Crumrine v. Vivint Solar, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05777
Defendant:
Vivint Solar, Inc., Dana Russell and David Bywater
Plaintiff:
Jason Crumrine
Russell et al v. Russell et al
as 3:2019cv00339
Plaintiff:
Noel L Russell, Dana M Russell, Dana Russell and others
Defendant:
Tina M Russell, Kenneth L Burgett, Tina Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James Meeks v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 16-2752
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD MEEKS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, OTHA CRAIGHEAD, DANA RUSSELL and others
Howard v. Montgomery County et al
as 8:2016cv03442
Defendant:
Montgomery County, Alexander Patapsis, Dana Russell and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meeks v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2015cv14270
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Otha Craighead, Dana Russell and others
Plaintiff:
James Edward Meeks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
