Cases 1 - 10 of 89
Hernandez-De Cornejo, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2731
Petitioner:
GLADIS ESPERANZA HERNANDEZ-DE CORNEJO, EMELY PAOLA CORNEJO-HERNANDEZ and LIAN DANIEL CORNEJO-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hernandez-Yanes, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4006
Petitioner:
FRANCIS DANIEL HERNANDEZ-YANES, ROSA RIVAS-RETANA and DANIEL ANTONIO HERNANDEZ-RIVAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hernandez-Hernandez v. Garland
as 23-7314
Petitioner:
MILTON DANIEL HERNANDEZ-HERNANDEZ, LIGIA MARIELA MOPOSITA-YANCHATUNA and STEPHEN DANIEL HERNANDEZ-MOPOSITA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Daniel Hernandez-Cruz v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1997
Petitioner:
DANIEL ANTONIO HERNANDEZ-CRUZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Hernandez-Lizarraga v. Sebastian County Sheriffs/Bailiffs et al
as 2:2023cv02068
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Hernandez-Lizarraga
Defendant:
Sebastian County Sheriffs/Bailiffs, CRR Inmate Task Force, Greg Napier Triplett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez-Lizarraga v. Napier et al
as 2:2023cv02062
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Hernandez-Lizarraga
Defendant:
Gregory Napier, Detective Mcleod, Deputy Prosecutor Robert McClure and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Hernandez
as 23-10272
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Daniel Marquez Hernandez
v. Pickard et al
as 6:2023cv00395
Defendant:
William Glenn Pickard, City of Sanford, Philip Glen Archer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
HERNANDEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03910
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JOSE HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Jose Zazueta-Hernandez
as 22-4063
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE DANIEL ZAZUETA-HERNANDEZ, aka Jesus Bojorquez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
