Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Watson v. McMullen et al
as 4:2023cv00680
Plaintiff:
Daniel Brady Watson
Defendant:
Ty McMullen and White County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. White County Detention Center et al
as 4:2023cv00679
Plaintiff:
Daniel Brady Watson
Defendant:
White County Detention Center and Meadows
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. White County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2023cv00466
Plaintiff:
Daniel Brady Watson
Defendant:
White County Sheriff's Department, RPS Inmate Roster, Ty McMullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brady v. GW Pharmaceuticals, PLC et al
as 1:2021cv02382
Defendant:
David Gryska, Catherine Mackey, William Waldegrave and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Brady
BRADY v. LIQUIDITY SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2019cv00632
Defendant:
LIQUIDITY SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BRADY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BRADY v. LIQUIDITY SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2018cv01040
Defendant:
LIQUIDITY SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BRADY
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
P.P.H. et al v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2017cv06170
Plaintiff:
P.P.H. and Jessica Perez
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officer Luis Reyes, Detective Daniel Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brady et al v. Gamanga et al
as 2:2017cv00071
Defendant:
OOIDA Risk Retention Group , Abdulai S. Gamanga, Andes Sundbakken and others
Plaintiff:
Rachel Hryniewich Brady and Daniel Brady
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simmons et al v. The City of Orlando et al
as 6:2016cv01909
Plaintiff:
Cleatous Joseph Simmons and Rhonda J. Simmons
Defendant:
The City of Orlando , Jeffrey Backhaus , Daniel Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brady #211714 v. Pima County et al
as 4:2016cv00157
Plaintiff:
Daniel Brady
Defendant:
Pima County and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
