Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
THOMAS v. SAUL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv01604
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff: DANIEL EDWARD THOMAS
Daniel Edward Johnson v. Andrew Saul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv01414
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: Daniel Edwards Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Daniel Edward Beeman v. Andrew Saul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv01404
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: Daniel Edward Beeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Tolliver v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv02183
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Daniel Edward Tolliver
Interested Party: SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Stolp v. Berryhill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2018cv03069
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Daniel Edward Stolp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Dill v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv03949
Plaintiff: Daniel Edward Dill
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DeGrange v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv03895
Plaintiff: Daniel Edward DeGrange
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hayes v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv00923
Plaintiff: Daniel Edward Hayes
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Daniel Edward Beeman v. Carolyn W. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv01811
Plaintiff: Daniel Edward Beeman
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
James v. Acting Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2016at00002
Plaintiff: Daniel Edward James
Defendant: Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?