Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00570
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03968
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Susan Nicholson Hofheinz v. Shout Factory, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv10053
Defendant:
Ballyhoo Motion Pictures, Daniel Griffith, DOES 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Susan Nicholson Hofheinz
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Da Vinci Investment, L. P., et al v. City of Arlington, Texa
as 17-11158
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DA VINCI INVESTMENT, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and DANIEL GRIFFITH
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ARLINGTON, TEXAS
Griffith v. City of Arlington, Texas et al
as 4:2015cv00099
Plaintiff:
Daniel Griffith
Defendant:
City of Arlington, Texas , Charlie Parker , Kathryn Wilemon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Drenis v. Haligiannis
as 14-167
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Jerry Drenis, Katherine Tsakonas, Athanasios Drenis and others
Defendant:
Sterling Watters Group, LP, Sterling Watters Capital Advisors, L.L.C., Ardantz Associates, LLP and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Peter Derby
Fischer v. Griffith et al
as 2:2013cv00898
Plaintiff:
Frederick J. Fischer
Defendant:
Daniel Griffith, Kevin Van Ommerman, Justin Jensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frederick Fischer v. Daniel Griffith, et al
as 12-35383
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK J. FISCHER
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL GRIFFITH, Correctional Officer and JOHN DOES 1-10
Griffith et al v. Goodyear Dunlop Tires North America LTD
as 1:2011cv00761
Plaintiff:
Daniel Griffith and Diane Griffith
Defendant:
Goodyear Dunlop Tires North America LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fischer v. Griffith et al
as 2:2010cv01898
Plaintiff:
Frederick J. Fischer
Defendant:
Daniel Griffith and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
