Cases 1 - 10 of 232
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Khazin v. City of New York
as 24-1236
Plaintiff:
Sergeant VALENTIN KHAZIN and LAWRENCE HAWKINS
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, SYLVESTER GE, JOHN SANFORD and others
Valencia v. Neal et al
as 3:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Mysti Valencia
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Jason Nowatzke, Christopher Beal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meyers v. Jenkins et al
as 5:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Amy Jenkins, R. Honeycutt, Jeffrey P. Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown, III v. Marten Transport LTD et al
as 2:2023cv07248
Plaintiff:
Daniel Brown, III
Defendant:
Marten Transport LTD, Willie E. Brown and ACE American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Meyers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Peter Buchholtz, Brandeshawn Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Biecker et al
as 5:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Chris Biecker, FNU Miller, R. Honeycutt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Honeycutt et al
as 5:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
R. Honeycutt, Amy Jenkins, Daniel Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Honeycutt et al
as 5:2023cv00181
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
R. Honeycutt, Amy Jenkins, Daniel Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
