Cases 21 - 30 of 359
Argo Wealth Management, Inc. et al v. Bremner et al
as 5:2022cv01137
Plaintiff:
Daniel Miller, Argo Wealth Management, Inc. and Aurora Hill Ltd.
Defendant:
john bremner, william reavis and Thomas Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Miller v. Kenton Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
as 3:2022cv00978
Plaintiff:
Danielle Miller
Defendant:
Kenton Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
MILLER v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as 5:2022cv10829
Plaintiff:
DANIEL MILLER
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
v. MILLER et al
as 2:2022cv10828
Defendant:
DANIEL MILLER and Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DIXON v. JONES et al
as 3:2022cv01455
Plaintiff:
DEVONTAE RONALD DIXON
Defendant:
BRYAN JONES, DANIEL MILLER, S DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 4:2022cv00078
Plaintiff:
Daniel Miller
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Genex Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
GARCIA v. THE GEO GROUP INC et al
as 3:2022cv01400
Plaintiff:
JUAN M GARCIA
Defendant:
THE GEO GROUP INC, DANIEL YOUNG and DANIEL MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Daniel Miller
as 21-4078
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DANIEL MILLER
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv02514
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE MILLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
