Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Tidwell et al v. Bradford et al
as 6:2014cv00444
Plaintiff:
Freddy Tidwell , Admiral Tidwell , Amanda Adams and others
Defendant:
Tommy Bradford and Damian Lauderdale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Mills v. Foulk
as 2:2014cv00513
Respondent:
Fred Foulk
Petitioner:
Joshua Daniel Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mills v. Foulk
as 2:2014at00223
Defendant:
Fred Foulk
Plaintiff:
Joshua Daniel Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tidwell et al v. Pilgrim's Pride Corporation et al
as 7:2013cv01420
Plaintiff:
Freddy Tidwell , Admiral Tidwell , Amanda Adams and others
Defendant:
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation and JBS, USA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Mills v. Colvin
as 3:2013cv06421
Plaintiff:
Garrett Daniel Mills
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Joshua Mills v. George Malim, et al
as 12-17441
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSHUA DANIEL MILLS
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE MALIM, Captain, Placer County Sheriff's Department, STEVEN VLADESOV, Sergeant, Placer County Sheriff's Department, SASHA GLENWINKEL, Deputy Sheriff, Placer County Sheriff's Department and others
Artistic Framing, Inc. v. Hospitality Resources Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv06997
Plaintiff:
Artistic Framing, Inc.
Defendant:
Hospitality Resources Inc. and M. Daniel Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mills v. Virga et al
as 2:2012cv00166
Plaintiff:
Joshua Daniel Mills
Defendant:
Tim Virga and California Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Malim et al
as 2:2011cv01852
Plaintiff:
Joshua Daniel Mills
Defendant:
George Malim, Steven Vladesov, Sasha Glenwinkel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLS v. ESSEX COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2010cv03844
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE MILLS
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, ESSEX COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
