Cases 31 - 40 of 101
FREY v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 3:2020cv03336
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Plaintiff:
DANIEL FREY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
CUCALON et al v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. et al
as 2:2020cv01429
Plaintiff:
LINA ROCIO CABRERA and DANIEL CUCALON
Defendant:
J.B. HUNT TRANSPORT, INC., J.B. HUNT TRANSPORT SERVICES, INC. and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Mullaly v. Long Island Railroad Company
as 1:2019cv07093
Defendant:
Long Island Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mullaly
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Dziengel v. Soo Line Railroad Company
as 0:2019cv00811
Plaintiff:
Daniel P. Dziengel
Defendant:
Soo Line Railroad Company, d/b/a Canadian Pacific Railroad and Soo Line Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
FLING v. MARTIN et al
as 1:2019cv00693
Defendant:
DANIEL GRANT, FREDERICO BYNOE, MEGAN J. BRENNAN and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL FLING
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 8101
DASILVA v. PORT AUTHORITY NY & NJ et al
as 2:2019cv00407
Plaintiff:
DANIEL DASILVA
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-20 (Fictitious Names), PORT AUTHORITY NY & NJ, PORT AUTHORITY TRANS HUDSON CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Ollek et al v. Long Island Rail Road Company
as 2:2018cv05696
Plaintiff:
Michael G Ollek, Daniel Ollek and Michael Ollek
Defendant:
Long Island Rail Road Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Miller v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2018cv03130
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ward Miller
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
KNIGHT v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 1:2018cv00673
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Plaintiff:
DANIEL KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Lemberger v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 8:2018cv00064
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lemberger
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
