Cases 1 - 10 of 1,121
Richards v. Exxon Mobile et al
as 1:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Christopher Richards
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil, A Corporation, Danny Long and Aaron Pina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lipscomb v. Slonaker et al
as 7:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Lipscomb
Defendant:
Katlynn Slonaker, Caroline Helsley, Amber Dopkowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Hendershot et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2024cv00958
Plaintiff:
Albert E Hendershot, Gerald Alameda, Lindell Algiere and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
TISDALE v. WEAVIL et al
as 1:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
IVORY JOE TISDALE
Defendant:
T.A. WEAVIL, DANNY ROGERS, VERONICA L. EDMINSTEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hubbard v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
James Danny Hubbard
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Danny Braswell v. Hampton Roads Regional Jail
as 24-6138
Plaintiff:
DANNY EARL BRASWELL
Defendant:
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL JAIL, LIEUTENANT STEVEN PHILLIPS, B. BROWN, Records/Classification Department and others
Nichols v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Danny Franklin Nichols
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Argueta v. USA
as 3:2024cv00138
Petitioner:
Jose Danny Argueta
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Braswell v. Ruby
as 4:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Danny Earl Braswell
Defendant:
Dr. Ruby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
