Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Smith v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv01551
Petitioner:
Darrell D. Smith
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Bailey et al.
as 5:2024cv00524
Plaintiff:
Darrell J. Smith
Defendant:
Sam Bailey, Holmes County Sheriff's Office Investigators, Jim Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
S.L. v. United States of America et al
as 4:2023cv06517
Plaintiff:
S.L.
Defendant:
United States of America, Darrell Wayne Smith and Ray J. Garcia
Darrell Smith v. Soc/theft/And/ID Theft
as 23-3451
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Darrell L. Smith
Defendant / Appellee:
Soc/theft/And/ID Theft
Smith v. Eischen
as 0:2023cv02866
Petitioner:
Darrell D. Smith
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
R. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) et al
as 4:2023cv04361
Plaintiff:
L. R.
Defendant:
United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) and Darrell Wayne Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
H. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) et al
as 4:2023cv04317
Plaintiff:
SA H and S. A. H.
Defendant:
United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) and Darrell Wayne Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Smith v. Eischen
as 0:2023cv01674
Petitioner:
Darrell D. Smith
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Siddiqi v. Standard Truss & Roof Supply Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv01139
Plaintiff:
Kashif Siddiqi
Defendant:
Standard Truss & Roof Supply Inc. and Darrell Sebastian Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith v. Soc/theft/And/Id Theft
as 8:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Darrell L. Smith
Defendant:
Soc/theft/And/Id Theft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
