Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Blake et al v. Davis et al
as 1:2011cv06320
Plaintiff:
Nathan Blake, James Kelly, Allen Barrington and others
Defendant:
J. Davis, Jennings, Matos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark et al v. River Birch Homes, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv03999
Plaintiff:
Darrell J. Clark , Darrell Clark , Darrell Clark, Jr. and others
Defendant:
River Birch Homes, Inc., River Birch Homes, L.L.C., North American Catastrophe Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
VURIMINDI v. REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2010cv01891
Plaintiff:
VAMSIDHAR R VURIMINDI
Defendant:
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, OFFICE OF THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, DARRELL CLARKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Marshall et al v. River Birch Homes, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv04733
Plaintiff:
Charles Marshall, Charles Marshall, Charles Marshall and others
Defendant:
River Birch Homes, Inc., River Birch Homes, L.L.C., Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
255 LATIMER DELI, INC. et al v. ASIAN AMERICAN LICENSED BEVERAGE ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2007cv03853
Plaintiff:
255 LATIMER DELI, INC., 255 LATIMER DELI, INC., 255 LATIMER DELI, INC. and others
Defendant:
DARRELL CLARKE and THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01744
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
United States of America v. Hyatt et al
as 4:2007cv00449
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jerry Glen Clark, Darrell Clark, Jerry E Hyatt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Watley v. Carter, et al
as 1:2000cv00928
Plaintiff:
Rayshan Watley, r
Defendant:
David Newsom , James Goodman , Kevin Underwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
