Cases 51 - 60 of 66
Davis v. Franklin et al
as 5:2009cv00114
Plaintiff:
Albert O Davis
Defendant:
Eric Franklin, Darrel Williams, Ms Wall and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Darrell Williams v. The People of the State of California
as 2:2008cv08144
Petitioner:
Darrell Williams
Respondent:
The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Medical, A.A. County Jail
as 8:2008cv03208
Plaintiff:
Darrell Williams
Defendant:
Medical, A.A. County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2008cv00364
Petitioner:
Darrell Williams
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Mitchell v. USA
as 1:2008cv80085
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Darrell William Mitchell
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Williams v. Taylor et al
as 1:2008cv00433
Plaintiff:
Darrell Williams
Defendant:
Benjamin Taylor, John Morgan, Cliff Gilheart and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. Meyers et al
as 4:2008cv01864
Plaintiff:
Darrell Williams
Defendant:
Reynaldo Meyers, Milton Pope, Assistant Dir Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. Meyers et al
as 8:2008cv01864
Plaintiff:
Darrell Williams
Defendant:
Reynaldo Meyers, Milton Pope, Assistant Dir Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Deubel v. Franklin County Adult Parole and Probation Department et al
as 1:2008cv00261
Plaintiff:
Darrell William Deubel
Defendant:
Franklin County Adult Parole and Probation Department, Brook Alleman and Ed Barrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2007cv00470
Petitioner:
Darrell Williams
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
