Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Dixon v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02014
Petitioner:
David Keandre Dixon
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
David Dixon v. State of North Carolina
as 23-7308
Petitioner:
DAVID KEANDRE DIXON
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and SHERIFF OF WAKE COUNTY
Dixon v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2023hc02249
Petitioner:
David Keandre Dixon
Respondent:
State of North Carolina and Sheriff of Wake County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dixon v. Trousdale Turner Correctional Center et al
as 3:2023cv00781
Plaintiff:
David Howard Dixon
Defendant:
Trousdale Turner Correctional Center, Tiffany Robertson, f/n/u Gayther and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Keppley et al
as 1:2022cv01585
Plaintiff:
Sharif Smith
Defendant:
Theodore J. Keppley, Christopher J. Speece, David C. Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Henger
as 7:2019cv00867
Petitioner:
David West Dixon
Respondent:
J. Henger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DIXON v. EMERSON
as 1:2018cv00912
Petitioner:
DAVID J. DIXON
Respondent:
EMERSON
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DIXON v. EMERSON
as 1:2018cv00910
Petitioner:
DAVID J. DIXON
Respondent:
EMERSON
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DIXON v. EMERSON
as 1:2018cv00913
Petitioner:
DAVID J. DIXON
Respondent:
EMERSON
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dixon v. USA
as 3:2016cv01679
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
David Timothy Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
